It simply has A LOT of tools, and as a result the interface ends up feeling a bit cluttered and confusing to a first time user. If there is one flaw with the software I’d have to say that it boils down to its learning curve. In fact, it is probably one of the better free options that I’ve come across in my travels. General Overviewĭarktable is no slouch when it comes to RAW file processing. Is it for you? I can’t say that for sure, but if you’re like me, and you’re saying – “Did he just say free?” – than why not head on over to Darktable’s website and get your own copy today. Subjectively, it's easier to cull in Lr (Compare/Survey mode), but still I do that in my photo viewer before ingesting into a catalogue. Smart Collections and a faster keywording/tagging experience. Lr's advantages as I see them: A better-flowing DAM, esp. My intention here is to introduce it to you and share with you some of my experiences within the first few hours of opening it up. When comparing Lightroom vs Darktable, the Slant community recommends Darktable for most people. Darktable vs Lightroom is more difficult because I feel they are more evenly matched. I’ve only spent a handful of hours with Darktable and therefore by no means have I mastered the workflow and features packed into it. I’d like to preface this article with a simple disclaimer… I know most everyone loves free stuff and quality RAW file editors are not easy to come by with a price tag of $0.00, so I thought it would be worth taking a quick look at Darktable vs Lightroom here on DPS. Recently I was introduced to a free open source RAW file editor called Darktable.

Lightroom vs darktable